Specificity vs. lexical restriction

Inspecting D-linking in wh-islands

Authors

  • Veronica Bressan NeTS IUSS Pavia, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
  • Adriana Belletti University of Siena
  • Cristiano Chesi NeTS IUSS Pavia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-1348

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11576/glow-1237

Keywords:

D-linking, Lexical restriction, wh-islands, Intervention, Specificity

Abstract

In this study, we follow up on the theoretical debate on the alleged syntactic effects of D-linking. We tried to tease apart the discourse-related component from the morphosyntactic effects driven by complex wh- phrases by (i) operationalizing D-linking as specificity and (ii) by comparing the acceptability of extraction of wh-items with and without D-linking, but crucially always bearing some form of lexical restriction. We present here three novel acceptability judgment tasks inspecting the role of D-linking and lexical restriction in the amelioration of Italian wh-island effects. Our results weaken the hypothesis that a discourse factor alone may modulate wh-island violations, while demanding deeper scrutiny on the role of lexical restriction.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Bressan, V., Belletti, A. and Chesi, C. (2026) “Specificity vs. lexical restriction: Inspecting D-linking in wh-islands”, Proceedings of GLOW, 47, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.11576/glow-1237.