https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/issue/feedLaughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)2020-10-30T13:08:38+00:00Open Journal Systems<p>Editors: Bogdan Ludusan, Magdalena Rychlowska, Gary McKeown and Petra Wagner<br>Affiliation: Bielefeld University and Queen's University Belfast<br><a href="http:/bit.ly/laughterWorkshop">Conference website</a></p>https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/903Laughter growing up2020-10-08T18:05:54+00:00Chiara Mazzocconichiara.mazzocconi@live.itJonathan Ginzburgyonatan.ginzburg@u-paris.fr<p>We present a longitudinal corpus observation of laughter use in child-mother interaction from 12 to 36 months of age from a pragmatic perspective. The main aim of our work is to investigate how laughter use in interaction may be informative about pragmatic development. We observe significant differences in child and mother use of laughter and changes over time as the child grows up, specifically in the frequency, in the pragmatic functions of laughter, and in the response to other’s laughter.</p>2020-10-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/908Acoustic vowel quality of filler particles in German2020-10-09T12:11:01+00:00Malte Belzmalte.belz@hu-berlin.de<p>The vowel quality of filler particles (FP) is studied for 24 speakers of German who produced 666 instances of vocalic (äh) and vocalic-nasal forms (ähm) in spontaneous dialogues. The FP vowel quality is compared to reference vowels of a word list as well as to phonologically and graphematically similarly constructed lexical syllables. Filler particles show a complete overlap with the reference vowels [÷] and [5], but overlap only partially with [E] and [@].</p>2020-10-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/912Social and acoustic determinants of perceived laughter intensity2020-10-08T18:05:51+00:00Magdalena RychlowskaM.Rychlowska@qub.ac.ukGary McKeownG.McKeown@qub.ac.ukIan SneddonI.Sneddon@qub.ac.ukWill CurranW.Curran@qub.ac.uk<p>Existing research links subjective judgments of perceived laughter intensity with features such as duration, amplitude, fundamental frequency, and voicing. We examine these associations in a new database of social laughs produced in situations inducing amusement, embarrassment, and schadenfreude. We also test the extent to which listeners’ judgments of laughter intensity vary as a function of the social situation in which laughs were produced.</p>2020-10-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/911A Semasiological Approach to Non-Lexical Conversational Sounds: Issues, Benefits and Impact2020-10-09T12:13:03+00:00Aurélie Chlébowskiaurelie.chlebowski@hotmail.fr<p>This paper proposes to consider a semasiological approach to non-verbal vocalisations. We claim that an acoustic analysis of the components of these sounds is needed to complement the findings of earlier studies. We propose that part of the information conveyed by these sounds comes from their acoustic components and that these components might be subjected to what resembles grammatical rules. Semantic issues are discussed at the end of the paper.</p>2020-10-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/918Nonverbal Vocalisations – A Forensic Phonetic Perspective2020-10-09T12:14:47+00:00Angelika Braunbrauna@uni-trier.de<p>This contribution approaches nonverbal vocalisations from an angle which is probably quite different from most other perspectives – its usability for forensic speaker comparison purposes. Thus the question is whether and if so, to what extent, nonverbal vocalisations are speaker specific. In this paper, it is argued that it is not so much any one individual trait which is speaker specific but rather a behavioral pattern consisting of various elements. How these vocalisations are covered in forensic phonetic reports is described. Various aspects of the behavioral pattern are dealt with: hesitations/filled pauses, breathing, clicks, question tags, tempo, and laughter.</p>2020-10-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/915Filled pauses and prolongations in Roman Italian task-oriented dialogue2020-10-08T18:05:47+00:00Jessica Di Napolijessica.dinapoli@ifaar.rwth-aachen.de<p>This paper presents work in progress on two markers of hesitation in Roman Italian task-oriented dialogue, namely filled pauses and prolongations. We investigate their form, relative frequency, and distributional characteristics in Italian. Initial results suggest that Italian speakers produce prolongations more frequently than filled pauses, and that the prototypical hesitant prolongation involves a word-final vowel.</p>2020-10-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/920A Distributional Analysis of Laughter Across Turns and Utterances2020-10-09T18:06:20+00:00Bogdan Ludusanbogdan.ludusan@uni-bielefeld.deMaik Wesemannm.wesemann@uni-bielefeld.dePetra Wagnerpetra.wagner@uni-bielefeld.de<p>We present here a study on the use of laughter in spontaneous interactions, examining its distribution across two linguistic levels: utterances and turns. A multilingual corpus of dyadic conversations was employed, containing recordings in French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Laughter was coded based on its position inside the analysis unit and its distribution with respect to the event type and the language was analyzed. The results showed that laughter distribution is modulated by the linguistic level, as well as by the laughter event type. Moreover, differences between languages seem to depend on the analysis level.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/921Functions and social meanings of click sounds in Irish English2020-10-09T18:06:19+00:00Marion Schultemarion.schulte@uni-bielefeld.de<p>This study investigates the use and function of click sounds in Irish English. These paralinguistic elements are multifunctional and similar to linguistic discoursepragmatic markers. In addition to their discourse and pragmatic functions, they also index social meanings and are shown to be connected with assertive and authoritative stances.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/923Nonverbal Vocalizations as Speech: Characterizing Natural-Environment Audio from Nonverbal Individuals with Autism2020-10-09T18:06:17+00:00Jaya Narainjnarain@mit.eduKristina T. Johnsonktj@mit.eduAmanda O’Brienamobrien@mit.eduPeter Woffordpeterwof@mit.eduPattie Maespattie@media.mit.eduRosalind Picardpicard@media.mit.edu<p>The study of nonverbal vocalizations, such as sighs, grunts, and monosyllabic sounds, has largely revolved around the social and affective implications of these sounds within typical speech. However, for individuals who do not use any traditional speech, including those with non- or minimally verbal (nv/mv) autism, these vocalizations contain important, individual-specific affective and communicative information. This paper outlines the methodology, analysis, and technology to investigate the production, perception, and meaning of nonverbal vocalizations from nv/mv individuals in natural environments. We are developing novel signal processing and machine learning methods that will help enable augmentative communication technology, and we are producing a nonverbal vocalization dataset for public release. We hope this work will expand the scientific understanding of these exceptional individuals’ language development and the field of communication more generally.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/922Laughing about laughter: comparing conversational analysis, emotion psychology, and dialogical semantics2020-10-09T18:06:16+00:00Jonathan Ginzburgyonatan.ginzburg@u-paris.frChiara Mazzocconichiara.mazzocconi@live.it<p>That laughter invites laughter is a basic tenet of Conversation Analysis analyses of laughter, whereas emotion psychology analyses describe various emotive and social effects laughter exhibits relative to various phonetic parameters. We provide data concerning laughter responses to laughter which we argue show neither approach can explicate and more generally suggest they cannot offer a general account of laughter and related non-verbal social signals. We sketch how distinct kinds of laughter responses to laughter - along with a host of other kinds of responses - can be systematically analyzed within a dialogical semantics, which integrates illocutionary and emotive effects.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/924L1 and L2 Production of Non-Lexical Hesitation Particles of German and English Native Speakers2020-10-09T18:06:12+00:00Beeke Muhlackmuhlack@lst.uni-saarland.de<p>This study focuses on the vowel quality of non-lexical hesitation particles produced by 24 English and German native speakers in their native language (L1) and their second language (L2) both of which are English and German. The aim is to show that a) English and German hesitation particles employ a different vowel quality and b) L2-learners of the respective language can adapt the native-like vowel quality if they are sufficiently proficient in their L2.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/926Cross-Corpora Study of Smiles and Laughter Mimicry in Dyadic Interactions2020-10-09T18:06:10+00:00Kevin El Haddadkevin.elhaddad@umons.ac.beThierry Dutoitthierry.dutoit@umons.ac.be<p>In this paper, we present preliminary results of our ongoing work on cross-corpora analyses of smiles and laughter mimicry. For this, instead of recording new data, we leverage the ones produced and available. We analyze smiles and laughs mimicry in three different datasets and show results similar to our previous work.<br>The data used here can be accessed at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3820510.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/927Silent pauses as clarification trigger2020-10-09T18:06:08+00:00Loredana Schettinolschettino@unisa.itMaria Di Maromaria.dimaro2@unina.itFrancesco Cutugnocutugno@unina.it<p>Among possible pragmatic feedback an interlocutor can use to acknowledge the degree of understanding of an utterance, clarification requests (CRs) are to be considered. The functional role of CRs can furthermore be expressed via silent pauses - or failed turn-giving moves - which express an understanding problem and are solved through a clarify speech act. In this work, we therefore hypothesise that some silent pauses, in specific conditions, may also have an interactional role which is interpreted by the speaker as a clarification need. </p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/928“LOL what?”: Empirical study of laughter in chat based dialogues2020-10-09T18:06:07+00:00Vladislav Maraevvladislav.maraev@gu.seChiara Mazzocconichiara.mazzocconi@live.itGregory Millsg.j.mills@rug.nlChristine Howeschristine.howes@gu.se<p>We propose a method for investigation of laughter in incremental text-based dialogues. We report a proof-of concept pilot study which inserts spoof contributions into ongoing text based dialogues. These take the form of additional laughs and laughter clarification requests which appear to come from one’s dialogue partner. This pilot shows that this is a useful way to investigate laughter in dialogue.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/929A Taxonomy of Non-verbal Responses to Gossip2020-10-09T18:06:06+00:00Bronagh Allisonballison01@qub.ac.ukGary McKeowng.mckeown@qub.ac.uk<p>Gossip is the exchange of socially relevant information. Sending and receiving gossip is a communicative process that involves evaluation of the information by the sender and receiver, with the receiver signalling their response by facial expressions or acoustic social signals. Responses to gossip may be positive or negative. Positive responses may be visual or acoustic, and negative responses may be indifferent or neutral. Here we will present a preliminary development of a taxonomy of the types of facial and acoustic responses displayed when an individual receives gossip information. This research will be developed to encompass a wider variety of social interaction and conversation events.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/930Posed and spontaneous nonverbal vocalizations of positive emotions: Acoustic analysis and perceptual judgments2020-10-09T18:06:04+00:00Roza G. Kamiloğlur.g.kamiloglu@uva.nlDisa A. Sauterr.g.kamiloglu@uva.nl<p>When experiencing different positive emotional states, like amusement or relief, we may produce nonverbal vocalizations such as laughs and sighs. In the current study, we describe the acoustic structure of posed and spontaneous nonverbal vocalizations of 14 different positive emotions, and test whether listeners (N =201) map the vocalizations to emotions. The results show that vocalizations of 13 different positive emotions were recognized at better-than-chance levels, but not vocalizations of being moved. Emotions varied in whether vocalizations were better recognized from spontaneous or posed expressions.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/931Comparing Annotations of Non-verbal Vocalisations in Speech Corpora2020-10-09T18:06:03+00:00Jürgen Trouvaintrouvain@lst.uni-saarland.deRaphael Wernerrwerner@lst.uni-saarland.de<p>In this study eleven corpora of spontaneous and scripted speech (in English and in German) are analysed regarding their annotation inventories of selected highly frequent nonverbal vocalisations (NVVs). It appears that only one corpus considers all NVVs and that laughter is the only NVV annotated in all corpora. The findings lead to a discussion of possible reasons for this situation. In conclusion it is argued that a wider distribution and more consistency is needed with respect to the annotation of NVVs.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/932Analysis of Laughter in Cohesive Groups2020-10-09T18:06:01+00:00Reshmashree B. Kantharajubangalore_kantharaju@upmc.frCatherine Pelachaudcatherine.pelachaud@upmc.fr<p>Group cohesion describes the tendency of the group members’ shared commitment to group tasks and the interpersonal attraction among them. This paper presents a preliminary analysis of occurrence of laughter with respect to group cohesion using a corpus of multi-party interactions. Results indicate that the occurrence of laughter is higher in cohesive segments and a strong positive correlation exists between the perceived level of cohesion and laughter.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)https://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/lw2020/article/view/933On the distribution of clicks and inbreaths in class presentations and spontaneous conversations: blending vocal and kinetic activities2020-10-30T13:08:38+00:00Loulou KosmalaLoulou.kosmala@sorbonne-nouvelle.fr<p>The present exploratory study compares the distribution of clicks and inbreaths in the productions of French students in two different communication settings (semiread oral class presentations vs spontaneous dyadic conversations). Grounded in a conversation analytic and discourse-pragmatic approach, mixing qualitative and quantitative methods, this study looks at the functions of clicks and inbreaths as well as accompanying kinetic behaviors (e.g swallowing, facial expressions, hand movement) in discourse. Preliminary results show a higher rate of pre-utterances clicks and inbreaths during oral presentations, which reflects the type of talk produced (structured and clear, which requires planning and preparation). And the qualitative analyses illustrate the ways speakers blend vocal and kinetic activities when producing clicks and inbreaths.</p>2020-10-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2020 Laughter and Other Non-Verbal Vocalisations Workshop: Proceedings (2020)